Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus has a general score of 79.7, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A6's 75.8 global score. Moto G Stylus's construction is newer, but thicker and somewhat heavier than the Galaxy A6. Motorola Moto G Stylus has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a little bit larger display, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2300px and a better amount of pixels per display inch.
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB. Moto G Stylus features a bit better CPU than Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Moto G Stylus also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G Stylus shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a much larger sensor capturing way better quality videos and photos, a much more MP back camera and a way higher video quality. The Motorola Moto G Stylus has superior battery life than Galaxy A6, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Moto G Stylus is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Moto G Stylus, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A6, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.