Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus is just a bit better than Galaxy A7 (2017), getting a score of 79.7 against 75.8. The Moto G Stylus is a incredibly newer phone than the Galaxy A7 (2017), but it's somewhat thicker and a bit heavier. The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has more RAM memory.
The Moto G Stylus has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a little bit bigger display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2300 pixels and a bit more pixels per inch of display. The Moto G Stylus features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto G Stylus features a way better camera than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a lot better video definition, a lot more mega-pixels camera and a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations. Motorola Moto G Stylus has a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.