Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus's global score of 79.7. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has the previous 10 version while Motorola Moto G Stylus has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a a bit thinner and just a bit lighter device than Motorola Moto G Stylus, even though both of them were released only a few months apart.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little bit better performance than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 4 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little bit better looking display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a bit longer battery life than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 13% larger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution camera and a bigger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.