Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a score of 85.2, which is just a bit better than Moto G Stylus's overall score of 79.7. Galaxy A9 (2018) is an older phone than the Moto G Stylus, but it is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a screen that's very similar to Motorola Moto G Stylus's screen, although the Galaxy A9 (2018) has a little bit lower screen density, a little bit worse 1080 x 2220 resolution and a quite smaller display.
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a little faster processor than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Moto G Stylus counts with a better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Moto G Stylus also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) features as much storage capacity for applications and games as the Moto G Stylus one, both of them have equal internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Moto G Stylus has a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 5 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.