Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-04-16 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus is slightly better than Galaxy C7, with a overall score of 79.7 against 77.7. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G Stylus has the older 11 version while Galaxy C7 has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Moto G Stylus is a notably newer device than the Galaxy C7, although it is somewhat heavier and incredibly thicker.
Moto G Stylus features just a bit better screen than Galaxy C7, because it has a little bigger screen, a bit higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2300 pixels. The Galaxy C7 and Motorola Moto G Stylus count with extremely similar processing units, both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Moto G Stylus counts with much more memory for apps and games than Galaxy C7, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G Stylus features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution camera, a lot better (4K) video quality and a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low light situations.
Moto G Stylus features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a 21% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.