Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | -- |
| Mystic indigo | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F23 has a score of 84.6, which is just a bit better than Moto G Stylus's global score of 79.7. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy F23 has the newer 12 version and Moto G Stylus has Android 11, giving some nice extra features and performance improvements. Samsung Galaxy F23 is a newer phone, and it is also a lot lighter and just a little thinner than the Moto G Stylus.
Samsung Galaxy F23 has just a little better processing power than Moto G Stylus. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The Galaxy F23 counts with just a bit better display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2408px resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a bit better pixel count in each screen inch.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a much better camera than Galaxy F23, because although it has a worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better photos in low light environments. Motorola Moto G Stylus has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy F23, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy F23 has superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.