Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M20, with a 79.7 score against 78.9. The Moto G Stylus is a newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy M20, although it is just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Moto G Stylus has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10, so it provides you some extra features.
Moto G Stylus counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M20. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a screen that is just as good as the display in Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although the Samsung Galaxy M20 has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit more pixels per inch of display.
Motorola Moto G Stylus captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos, a lot bigger sensor providing a much better image quality, a back-facing camera with lot more MP and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Moto G Stylus features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Moto G Stylus also has 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy M20 has superior battery lifetime than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.