Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 397 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 is much better than the Moto G Stylus, getting a general score of 87.7 against 79.7. Both devices we compare here include Android OS, but Galaxy M51 has the previous 10 version and Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version. Galaxy M51's body is just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than the Moto G Stylus.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a screen that's just as good as the Moto G Stylus one, because although the Samsung Galaxy M51 has a little bit worse number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy M51 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting images or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a way better resolution back-facing camera and a bigger sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 and Moto G Stylus count with similar memory for games and applications, both of them have exactly the same internal storage and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M51 counts with a really longer battery performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 75% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.