Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, having a score of 79.7 against 79.3. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but Moto G Stylus has the newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, offering some extra features. Even though Moto G Stylus is incredibly newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, it's somewhat thicker and heavier.
Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a larger number of cores (although slower). The Galaxy Note 5 has a brighter screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Moto G Stylus features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto G Stylus takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a lot larger sensor, a bigger diafragm aperture and a camera in the back with much more MP.
The Moto G Stylus features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 33% more battery size.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.