Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a global score of 80.4, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto G Stylus's 79.7 overall score. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is an notably older cellphone than Motorola Moto G Stylus, but it's somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with just a little better performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus. They have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Motorola Moto G Stylus captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a bigger sensor and a lot better resolution back facing camera.
Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G Stylus counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Stylus. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Moto G Stylus, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.