Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus is slightly better than the Galaxy Note7, having a score of 79.7 against 79.5. Although Moto G Stylus is notably newer than Galaxy Note7, it is thicker and heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note7 features a little more vivid display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Motorola Moto G Stylus has much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Moto G Stylus features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto G Stylus also has a greater number of cores.
Moto G Stylus counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery size. Motorola Moto G Stylus takes a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a larger sensor shooting better quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.