Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| $ 300.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than Motorola Moto G Stylus, having a global score of 89.7 against 79.7. Galaxy S10 Lite is a a little lighter and thinner cellphone than Motorola Moto G Stylus, even when both of them were released with only a couple months difference. The Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit sharper display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has just a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit better battery lifetime than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, and they both have a 0.5 inches camera sensor, a back camera with a 48 mega-pixels and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.