Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is better than Moto G Stylus's overall score of 79.7. Both phones in this comparison have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Galaxy S20 FE is a just a bit thinner and a little lighter phone than the Moto G Stylus, even though they were released with only a few months difference.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit better processor than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a little bit higher screen pixel density and a quite larger display.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking less light and duller colors and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also counts with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a larger aperture to take better photos in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 FE features a bit better battery duration than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy S20 FE is way more expensive than Moto G Stylus, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.