Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 FE is better than the Moto G Stylus, with an 89.1 score against 79.7. Both phones in this review work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding OS features. Galaxy S21 FE is a newer phone, and it is also somewhat lighter and thinner than the Moto G Stylus.
Galaxy S21 FE counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy S21 FE also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a just a bit higher screen pixel density. The Galaxy S21 FE features a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S21 FE also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Moto G Stylus has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G Stylus also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy S21 FE features a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Moto G Stylus counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto G Stylus also counts with a camera with much more megapixels and a bigger aperture.
Although Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G Stylus. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, else you can save some money and buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.