Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 has an overall score of 93.4, which is better than Moto G Stylus's 79.7 score. Galaxy S22 is a newer phone, and it is also lighter and thinner than the Moto G Stylus. Both devices we are comparing include Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11.
Galaxy S22 features a way better looking display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better display density and a little bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution. Samsung Galaxy S22 features just a little better performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S22 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way better video quality, a more MP camera in the back and a lot larger camera sensor shooting much better quality photos.
Moto G Stylus features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Moto G Stylus also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Stylus has a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S22, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G Stylus. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Moto G Stylus, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.