Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-16 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 6.77 ounces | -- |
| Mystic indigo | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Stylus, with a score of 82.6 against 79.7. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S25 has the newer 14 version and Motorola Moto G Stylus has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy S25 is a way thinner and way lighter device than the Motorola Moto G Stylus.
The Moto G Stylus features a much more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 has an incredibly better screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a just a little better display density.
The Galaxy S25 captures slightly better photographs and videos than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a better 50 MP resolution back facing camera and a lot bigger sensor capturing way higher quality photographs.
The Moto G Stylus features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G Stylus also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S25's battery performance is very similar to the Moto G Stylus one.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Stylus. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Moto G Stylus, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.