Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-16 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 6.77 ounces | -- |
| Mystic indigo | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than Moto G Stylus, having a overall score of 90.7 against 79.7. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version, giving you some extra features and performance enhancements. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a incredibly lighter and extremely thinner cellphone than the Moto G Stylus.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a little bit larger display, more pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. The Moto G Stylus features slightly more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a very superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a lot better camera than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a back facing camera with a way better resolution, a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with improved battery duration than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.