Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus is just a bit better than the Galaxy S5 Sport, with a global score of 79.7 against 77.8. Even though Moto G Stylus is much newer than the Galaxy S5 Sport, it is heavier and a bit thicker. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Moto G Stylus has the older 11 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a much smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels density. Moto G Stylus has a very superior storage for applications and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB and 112 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features just a bit better processing power than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and less RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Motorola Moto G Stylus shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a much larger diafragm aperture for better photography and videos in low-light environments, a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution camera.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Moto G Stylus is a bit more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.