Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a general score of 79.7, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S7's score of 79.5. Although the Motorola Moto G Stylus is noticeably newer than Samsung Galaxy S7, it's thicker and a lot heavier. Moto G Stylus counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy S7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Moto G Stylus also has a higher number of cores (but slower).
The Galaxy S7 features a much more vibrant display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater screen density. Moto G Stylus has a better camera than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Moto G Stylus also has a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures and a back camera with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The Moto G Stylus has a much greater storage for apps and games than Galaxy S7, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Stylus has greater battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a 33 percent more battery capacity.
Although Moto G Stylus is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S7. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Moto G Stylus, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy S7, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.