Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus has a score of 79.7, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active's score of 75.8. Moto G Stylus is a notably newer and a little bit thinner device than Galaxy S7 Active, although it is also just a little bit heavier. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a better looking screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher pixels quantity per inch of screen.
Moto G Stylus has a much greater storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory. The Moto G Stylus features a bit better CPU than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto G Stylus also has a greater number of cores.
Galaxy S7 Active has a battery duration that is just as good as Moto G Stylus's battery lifetime. Moto G Stylus captures a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, a same size camera aperture and the same video frame rate, the Moto G Stylus also has a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The Moto G Stylus costs more money than the Galaxy S7 Active, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.