Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 397 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than Moto G Stylus, getting an 80.1 score against 79.7. Although it's the best we compare here, Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a notably thicker and noticeably heavier cellphone than the Moto G Stylus. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features and increased performance.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a sharper display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater display pixels density. Moto G Stylus has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Moto G Stylus also has more internal memory.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G Stylus. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a little better battery life than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size. Moto G Stylus shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs in low-light situations, it also counts with a much better video definition, a camera in the back with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G Stylus. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Moto G Stylus, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.