Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, with an 81 score against 79.7. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding operating system features. The Galaxy XCover Pro body is somewhat heavier and a bit thicker than the Motorola Moto G Stylus.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a little better processing power than Moto G Stylus. They have 8 processing cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Motorola Moto G Stylus captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a camera in the back with lot more MP, a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Moto G Stylus features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Moto G Stylus also has 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little better battery performance than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 1% bigger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Stylus. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Moto G Stylus, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.