Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a global score of 85.6, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus's 79.7 general score. Both phones in this comparison review work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a newer phone, and it is also a little lighter and much thinner than the Motorola Moto G Stylus.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a bit larger screen, a bit more pixels per inch of display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636px resolution. Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little bit better performance than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a larger diafragm aperture and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels. The Moto G Stylus counts with much more memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G Stylus also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
Moto G Stylus counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto G Stylus. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip 3, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Moto G Stylus, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.