Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 300.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is much better than Moto G Stylus's general score of 79.7. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both of them should count with all the same OS features. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a just a bit lighter and noticeably thinner phone than Moto G Stylus, even when they were released only 4 months apart.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a bit better screen than Moto G Stylus, because it has a bit greater pixel density, a little bit bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636px. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Moto G Stylus has a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G Stylus also counts with a much better 48 MP resolution back camera, a lot larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and videos.
Moto G Stylus has just a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Moto G Stylus features superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot more expensive than Moto G Stylus, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.