Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is better than Moto G Stylus's score of 79.7. Both phones in this comparison come with the same Android 11 operating system. Galaxy Z Fold 3's design is newer and way thinner, but heavier than the Moto G Stylus. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a display that's just as good as Motorola Moto G Stylus's screen, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208 and a larger display.
Moto G Stylus counts with just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little faster processor than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a bit better battery duration than Moto G Stylus, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity. The Moto G Stylus has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much larger aperture for better low light photography and video and a way higher 48 MP resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.