Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 94.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2021-01-26 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.70 x 3.00 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 2500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 1644 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 643 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 22.92 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xperia PRO has a general score of 94.3, which is much better than the Moto G Stylus's 79.7 score. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Xperia PRO has the older 10 version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11. Xperia PRO's body is newer than the Moto G Stylus's, although it is heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Xperia PRO has a much better display than Moto G Stylus, because it has a way higher 1644 x 3840 pixels resolution, a way higher display density and a bit larger display. The Xperia PRO features a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xperia PRO also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Moto G Stylus captures better pictures and videos than Xperia PRO, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier camera sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size diafragm aperture, the Moto G Stylus also counts with a much higher resolution camera.
The Xperia PRO counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Moto G Stylus, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB and 384 GB more internal storage. Xperia PRO's battery performance is very similar to the Motorola Moto G Stylus one.
Although Sony Xperia PRO is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G Stylus. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Moto G Stylus, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.