Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a global score of 79.7, which is a bit better than Xperia XZs's score of 77.2. Even though Motorola Moto G Stylus is incredibly newer than the Xperia XZs, it is thicker and somewhat heavier. The Xperia XZs has a little bit better looking screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels amount per display inch.
Moto G Stylus features a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Xperia XZs, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB and more internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto G Stylus has a bit superior processor than Sony Xperia XZs, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a larger number of cores (although they are slower).
The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a really longer battery performance than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 38 percent more battery size. The Sony Xperia XZs counts with a better camera than Moto G Stylus, although it has a smaller sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, a lower video definition, a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light captures and videos and a back facing camera with way less mega-pixels.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Moto G Stylus is also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.