Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a score of 82.9, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus's 79.7 general score. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's body is just a little heavier but a little thinner than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, and both were released with only 6 months difference.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has a little bit higher display density and a slightly better 1080 x 2340px resolution. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Moto G Stylus features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Moto G Stylus also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features just a bit better camera than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking images or videos in low light environments, and they both have a camera in the back with a 48 mega pixels resolution, the same sensor size and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also counts with higher video frame rates.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro and Moto G Stylus count with similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.