Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2021-05-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Mirror Black and Pale Grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 300.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is better than Moto G Stylus, with a general score of 88.3 against 79.7. Both phones in this comparison use the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 body is newer than Moto G Stylus's, although it is just a little bit heavier and thicker.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a better looking screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit worse display density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit bigger display. Motorola Moto G Stylus has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a bit superior processor than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a slightly better camera than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have a back camera with a 48 mega-pixels, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.