Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has an overall score of 81.4, which is just a bit better than Moto G Stylus's 79.7 global score. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's design is thinner and somewhat lighter than Moto G Stylus, although it was released about 12 months before. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version, providing you a lot of extra features and performance tweaks.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. Moto G Stylus has a way bigger memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Moto G Stylus also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a bit superior CPU than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also has more RAM memory. The Moto G Stylus features greater battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a bit better camera than Moto G Stylus, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos and videos in poorly lited situations, they both have a same size back camera sensor, the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same (4K) video quality and a camera with a 48 mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.