Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is just a bit better than Moto G Stylus, having a global score of 82.7 against 79.7. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a a little bit lighter and just a little thinner cellphone than the Moto G Stylus, even though they were released with only 8 months difference. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has an older 10 version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with just a bit better screen than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a same size screen, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little better screen density.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photographs or video in low-light situations, and they both have a same size sensor, a 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with better video frame rate.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro and Moto G Stylus have incredibly similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.