Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-04-16 | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus has an overall score of 79.7, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Note 2's global score of 76. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but Moto G Stylus has an older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Moto G Stylus's body is much newer than Xiaomi Mi Note 2's, but it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Moto G Stylus counts with just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a quite larger screen, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2300 pixels and a little bit higher pixel quantity in each inch in the screen. The Moto G Stylus has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Moto G Stylus also has an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Moto G Stylus and Xiaomi Mi Note 2 have quite similar CPUs, because although the Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 counts with a little longer battery duration than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 4070mAh battery size.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G Stylus also has a larger aperture to take better low light captures and video, a way larger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures and a back camera with way more megapixels.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.