Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than Motorola Moto G Stylus, with an 87.9 score against 79.7. These devices come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the previous 10 version while Motorola Moto G Stylus has Android 11. Even though Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro and the Motorola Moto G Stylus were only released with a couple months difference, Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's design is a little bit thinner but somewhat heavier.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a bit larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Moto G Stylus counts with much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G Stylus also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a better camera than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger sensor providing a better image quality.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features improved battery life than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has an 18 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.