Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.32 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.97 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has an overall score of 91.5, which is much better than the Moto G Stylus's general score of 79.7. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer's construction is extremely newer and a little bit thinner, but also a bit heavier than the Moto G Stylus. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has the newer 12 version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11, so it provides you some additional features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a bit better processor than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a bit worse pixel number in each inch of display, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with just a bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a little better battery performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a way better camera than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same video frame rate and a F1.7 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a much bigger camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a camera in the back with a much better 200 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.