Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | -- |
| Mystic indigo | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, getting a overall score of 79.7 against 77.1. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Moto G Stylus has older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13 version. The Moto G Stylus has a way better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a sharper display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a just a little worse pixels amount in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite bigger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has just a bit better camera than Moto G Stylus, because it has a larger camera aperture to take better low light images and video, a lot larger back camera sensor capturing much better quality photographs and a much better 200 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G Stylus, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features improved battery performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 25 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.