Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | -- |
| Mystic indigo | Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2710 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a general score of 83.1, which is just a bit better than Moto G Stylus's score of 79.7. These devices work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a more recent 13 version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G is a noticeably newer phone, and it's also notably lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G Stylus.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a sharper screen than Moto G Stylus, because it has a quite larger screen, a slightly higher resolution of 1220 x 2710 pixels and a bit more pixels per display inch. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB more internal storage.
Moto G Stylus has a very superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has longer battery duration than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 28% bigger battery size. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G Stylus, because it has a way more megapixels back-facing camera, a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and a much larger camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.