Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, having a overall score of 79.7 against 76.6. Although Motorola Moto G Stylus and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 were released only 1 months apart, Motorola Moto G Stylus's body is a little bit thicker but just a little lighter. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Moto G Stylus has a more recent 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10 version, providing some nice extra features.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a display that's just as good as Moto G Stylus's screen, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a little worse pixel number in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little larger screen. The Moto G Stylus features a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a CPU that's very similar to the CPU in Moto G Stylus, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Moto G Stylus counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back and the same camera sensor size, the Moto G Stylus also has a bigger aperture to take better photos in low-light situations and a way better (4K) video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with better battery duration than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
The Moto G Stylus is a bit more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.