Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android |
| 2021-04-15 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey | Black and White |
| -- | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is slightly better than the Moto G100's score of 88.9. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's body is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G100, despite of the fact that it was released just 20 months before. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android operating system, while Moto G100 counts with Android 11 operating system.
The Motorola Moto G100 has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola Moto G100 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Moto G100 features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Moto G100 also has a little bit greater pixel density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels.
The Moto G100 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have a 0.5 inches sensor, the Moto G100 also has a lot higher resolution back facing camera, a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and video and a much better 5760x3240 video definition.
Moto G100 has slightly more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Moto G100 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Motorola Moto G100 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.