Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-15 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey | Black and White |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G100 has a score of 88.9, which is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS, but Moto G100 has the previous 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Moto G100 is a notably older and thicker device than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Motorola managed to build it just a little bit lighter anyway.
Moto G100 counts with a much more powerful processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better looking screen than Moto G100, because it has a bit higher pixels density, a way better 2200 x 2480px resolution and a larger display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes clearer videos and photos than Moto G100, because although it has a camera with a much worse 50 mega pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also counts with a lot better video quality and a way bigger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a better storage for apps and games than Moto G100, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit better battery lifetime than Moto G100, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.