Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is just a bit better than the iPhone XS Max, having a overall score of 86.2 against 84.5. Moto G200 5G is a way newer and just a little bit lighter phone than iPhone XS Max, but it is thicker. The Apple iPhone XS Max counts with just a bit better looking display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixel number per display inch and a slightly better 1242 x 2688 pixels resolution.
The Apple iPhone XS Max features a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The Moto G200 5G features a superior camera than iPhone XS Max, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing pictures in poorly lited situations and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a camera with lot more MP.
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Moto G200 5G counts with a superior battery performance than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.