Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2024-01-08 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Phantom Black and Rebel Grey |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | QualcommSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 7.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G has an overall score of 86.2, which is a bit better than Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro's 84.2 score. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but the Moto G200 5G has older 11 version while Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has Android 14 version. The Moto G200 5G is a lighter cellphone than Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro, but they are 0.35inches thick.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a much better performing processor than Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has a brighter screen than Moto G200 5G, although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a bit worse display density, they both have a same size display.
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro features a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega-pixels, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video definition. Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G200 5G, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro counts with a little longer battery performance than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because it has a 5500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.