Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A12, having a global score of 86.2 against 80.3. Both devices in this review use Android OS, but the Moto G200 5G has a more recent 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A12 has Android 10. The Moto G200 5G is a a little lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy A12, but they are 0.35inches thick.
Moto G200 5G counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy A12, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Moto G200 5G also has more RAM. The Moto G200 5G counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A12, because it has a little bit larger display, more pixels per screen inch and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A12 has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G200 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Moto G200 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A12, because it has a lot better resolution camera in the back, a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and a way higher video resolution.
Galaxy A12 and Motorola Moto G200 5G both count with really similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.