Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a general score of 86.2, which is a bit better than Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 overall score. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Moto G200 5G has the older 11 version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version. Although it's the best phone in this comparison, we must highlight that it is also extremely older, just a bit heavier and a little thicker.
The Moto G200 5G features a much greater processing power than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Moto G200 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A25 5G features a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density.
The Moto G200 5G features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A25 5G also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Moto G200 5G and the Galaxy A25 5G feature really similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.