Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android |
| 2021-11-18 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 395 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G has a global score of 86.2, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A32's 84.7 score. The Moto G200 5G construction is newer, just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A32. The Moto G200 5G counts with Android 11 operating system, while Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android operating system.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has more RAM memory. Motorola Moto G200 5G features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2460, a higher pixels count in each inch of screen and a little bit bigger display.
The Moto G200 5G captures slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G200 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 and Motorola Moto G200 5G both have very similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.