Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | -- |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G200 5G, with a global score of 90.7 against 86.2. The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter device than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, even when both were released only 8 months apart. The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 features a screen that's very similar to the screen in Moto G200 5G, because although the Galaxy A52 has a little smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels amount per inch in the screen. The Galaxy A52 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a way less megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a worse video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light photography and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a superior memory for apps and games than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Moto G200 5G has a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A52, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.