Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has an overall score of 86.2, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018)'s score of 84.2. Although the Motorola Moto G200 5G is a lot newer than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), it's heavier and somewhat thicker. Moto G200 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Moto G200 5G also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a screen that is very similar to the Moto G200 5G one, because although the Galaxy A7 (2018) has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2220px, it also counts with a quite higher pixel density. Moto G200 5G captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) has a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Moto G200 5G counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 52% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.