Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is a bit better than Motorola Moto G200 5G, getting a 91.8 score against 86.2. Galaxy A71 5G's construction is a little lighter and a little bit thinner than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, even though it was released only 17 months before. Both phones in this comparison work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy A71 5G has a screen that is just as good as the Moto G200 5G one, although the Galaxy A71 5G has a bit lower pixels density, a bit smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Galaxy A71 5G captures a bit better photos and videos than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a much lower resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light situations. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.