Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black and White |
| Glass | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, having a score of 90.5 against 86.2. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS, and Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with Android 11 OS. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G design is just a bit thinner than Motorola Moto G200 5G, although it's just a little heavier and was released many years before.
Motorola Moto G200 5G has just a bit better performance than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a display that is just as good as the Moto G200 5G one, although the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a little smaller screen, a little inferior pixel quantity in each inch in the display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Motorola Moto G200 5G captures just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and video.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G200 5G features a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.