Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-11-18 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black and Gold |
| Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G has a score of 86.2, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 score. The Moto G200 5G is a much newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it's thicker and a little bit heavier. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but Moto G200 5G has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Moto G200 5G has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, a just a little greater amount of pixels per inch of display and a little bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a little bit better memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Moto G200 5G counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a F1.9 camera aperture, the Moto G200 5G also has a way more MP camera in the back and a much better (4K) video resolution.
Motorola Moto G200 5G features longer battery life than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.