Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is a bit better than Moto G200 5G, having an 87.1 score against 86.2. Galaxy Note9 is a a little lighter cellphone than the Moto G200 5G, but both of them have the same thickness. The Moto G200 5G has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Moto G200 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Note9 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a greater pixel amount per inch of display. Galaxy Note9 has much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy Note9 also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
The Moto G200 5G has better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Moto G200 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a way tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or videos in low-light situations and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.